Parents and teachers struggle to provide education for students with disabilities

Sunday, October 09, 2005 • By MEGAN ZARODA • The Express-Times

At 15 years old, the typical teenage girl would be doodling hearts with boys' names inside, going to sleepovers and pilfering items from her mother's cosmetic bag.

But Alaura Mowrey's biggest daily worry is whether she'll be able to watch Barney, the cartoon dinosaur.

Alaura, 15, of Lower Saucon Township, was diagnosed at birth with Down syndrome and multiple physical disabilities. Due to her handicaps, she functions on the developmental level of a 6-year-old, her mother, Judy Mowrey, said.

Down syndrome is caused by an error in cell division which results in an extra 21 chromosomes that alter a child's development.

When Alaura reached school age, she was placed in general education classrooms and received assistive therapy on the side. As she grew older her parents realized inclusion was not the best educational option for their daughter.

"I wanted her to be included all the time," Judy Mowrey said, "but she was nowhere near a normal 15-year-old and the span was getting wider and wider."

Alaura was reassigned to a program in which she spent half of her school day in a regular classroom and half in a life skills class.

Yet her developmental gap increased again due to curriculum and social changes, so she moved into a life skills class full time. Now Alaura is realizing even those students are different from her.

Because her school district lacks a life skills program, Alaura is bused to a Wilson Area High School classroom where she is the only student with Down syndrome. While the other students have disabilities, Judy Mowrey said, they look normal to her daughter.

Judy Mowrey said she is thinking about sending Alaura to a private institution designed specifically for students with disabilities.

She said that when placed in regular classroom settings, students with special needs emulate the behavior of their peers.

And children don't see the disability, she said. To this day, one girl from her elementary school days phones Alaura, and the two families have become close.

As students age, the gap between them increases academically, socially and physically. This, Judy Mowrey said, could create stress or angst in students with disabilities because they realize they may not be able to perform at the same level.

"The road to go is the way we went," she said. "We did it slowly, and Alaura was exposed to both worlds."

Putting it in writing

What enables many parents to tailor an appropriate program for their disabled children is what educators call an individualized education program, or IEP.

It is a written plan for educating a student who has a disability or is gifted. The plan is based on individual needs. Collaboration between the student's parents and educators produces a description of those needs and an understanding of the special help the child will receive in school.

"Every child has the right to belong," said Donna Hopfsteader, director of speech and hearing at Pennsylvania's Colonial Intermediate Unit 20.

"You don't just include to include. You have to ask, how appropriate is it?"

While the primary goal is to include students with special needs into a regular education classroom, inclusion is never explicitly stated or required by federal law. The law does, however, mandate appropriate inclusive practices and supports, which educators refer to as the "least restrictive environment."

The phrase refers to the educational setting in which students with disabilities can receive a free, appropriate education designed with their needs in mind. To the maximum extent possible, this goal is to be pursued in a regular educational environment with non-disabled peers.

"Least restrictive is a relative term what's least restrictive for that child?" Hopfsteader asked. "You start from the assumption they can be placed in regular education and the child's placement starts and continues on that continuum."

Barbara Gantwerk, director of the office of special education at the New Jersey Department of Education, said the biggest issue facing the Garden State is to provide the supports needed to include more students with disabilities into the general education curriculum.

"The more we can provide access to general education, the more we will achieve that challenge," she said.

Fifty years ago students with disabilities were shunted off to separate classes or facilities, Gantwerk said, in the belief they needed "something entirely different."

Gantwerk says there is now an expectation that students with special needs will be in every class and may not be identifiable because they may not be disabled in a particular class.

"Students with disabilities will graduate and live in a regular world. That's what the school needs to be," Gantwerk said.

"You don't want to set up pretend communities for children in the school."

Gantwerk said that when students with disabilities are removed from the general education curriculum, they will fall behind. Therefore, there is a clear benefit to including them in a regular program rather than shuffling them into their own classes, she says.

"We have an over-reliance on (self-contained) places," Gantwerk said of the New Jersey school system. "But we're not saying we don't need them."

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, about half of all disabled students in the 2003-2004 school year spent 80 percent or more of their day in a regular classroom, which was a 5 percent increase over 10 years ago.

"I don't think there is a type of disability that is not includable, contrary to what anybody says," said Gina Scala, chairwoman of the special education and rehabilitation department at East Stroudsburg University.

"Kids with disabilities are part of the typical world. They don't go to special-ed McDonald's or special-ed movies," she said.

Scala repeatedly insists on the importance of appropriate support and services. Without them, she said, educators increase the inappropriateness of a student's placement in a regular classroom.

"Personally and professionally, everybody has a chance to succeed. And to succeed with the appropriate support and services."

Scala said the professors in her department teach students what the law mandates and how to use that as a basis for reflective and deliberate decision-making when it comes to evaluating a child's placement.

Though inclusion didn't work for Alaura, Judy Mowrey still supports the practice, especially for younger children.

"We all learn through observation," she said. "Keep in mind, it's not any different for them."


© 2005 The Express-Times. Used with permission.

Return to Articles page