N.J.
panel urges benefits cuts for teachers,
others
Thursday, December 01, 2005
BY JOE DONOHUE Star-Ledger
Staff
A state advisory panel today will
recommend that the retirement age for teachers and state
workers be raised from 55 to 60 and that employees of the
state and some local governments pay a greater share of
their health insurance premiums to stem soaring fringe
benefit costs.
The Benefits Review Task Force also will
call for an end to pensions for municipal attorneys,
assessors and other "professional services" vendors who do
not work directly for the government, according to details
of a report to be released today. Some lawmakers have
fattened their pensions by taking on such work.
The advisory panel, however, rejected
suggestions that the state drop its pension system in favor
of a "defined contribution" plan like a 401k for new public
workers, according to a Codey administration
source.
Earlier this year, the state's pension
director predicted that without major changes, the $2.2
billion tab for health insurance and retirement benefits
could triple in just five years.
The recommendations are expected to draw
opposition from powerful unions, including the New Jersey
Education Association, which represents 192,000 teachers and
support staff members. Changes to the pension system require
approval by lawmakers. Health benefits are negotiated in
contract talks.
The task force, appointed by acting Gov.
Richard Codey in May, says government workers should get
full retirement benefits if they retire at 60. Currently
members of retirement funds for state and local workers and
teachers can get retire with full benefits at age 55 if they
have at least 25 years of service.
The panel urged that workers get reduced
benefits if they retire before age 60, saying it would
generate $175 million in state and local savings by the
third year. The task force noted that 91 percent of large
private employers use 65 years as the cutoff for full
benefits. At least 13 states have a cutoff older than
55.
Steven Baker, a spokesman for the New
Jersey Education Association, said that while the teachers
union would support a crackdown on abusive pension
practices, it would resist an increase in the retirement
age.
"We would be opposed to something that
diminishes the retirement benefits of our members and this
is something that does that," he said.
However, Gregg Edwards, president of the
Center for Policy Research of New Jersey, a conservative
think tank, applauded the recommendation.
"People are living longer. Many people
are choosing not to retire at an early age," Edwards said.
"And early retirement is a bad incentive to provide,
especially for teachers."
The task force wants to require the
nearly 80,000 state workers, along with employees of
municipalities that are insured through the system, to
contribute more toward their health insurance.
Currently, workers with the most basic
coverage pay nothing. Those insured by HMOs pay 5 percent,
while those with the most generous, traditional policies pay
25 percent. The traditional plan is closed to new employees.
The task force said if the state required 10 percent
contributions for those insured under the basic policies,
state and local governments would save $489 million a
year.
"The Task Force believes that all active
and retired employees should share in the cost of health
care," the report states.
Alan Kaufman, spokesman for the
Communications Workers of America, which represents more
than 36,000 state workers, said public workers should not be
penalized, charging that Republican tax cuts in the 1990s
left state officials unable to afford rising fringe benefit
payments.
"They have an obligation to fund the
pension plan because they were totally irresponsible in
terms of how they handled the budget," he said.
Changes in health insurance benefits are
subject to contract talks, and most state worker contracts
do not expire until June 30, 2007. "It's very nice this task
force wants to make proposals, but proposals on health care
are made across the table," Kaufman said.
A Codey administration official said the
recommendations would go a long way toward halting the
skyrocketing of fringe benefits costs.
"There's a serious problem. We think
there are some serious ideas for people to consider in this
report," said the official.
Staff writer Dunstan McNichol contributed to this
report.
© 2005 The Star-Ledger. Used by NJ.com with
permission.
|